The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Contemporary Security Policy

Volume 34, Issue 2, 2013

Translator disclaimer
A Tragic Lack of Ambition: Why EU Security Policy is no Strategy
Symposium: Explaining European Security Policy

A Tragic Lack of Ambition: Why EU Security Policy is no Strategy

DOI:
10.1080/13523260.2013.808076
Olivier Schmitt*

pages 413-416

Abstract

Tools of classical strategic analysis support distinctive explanations for the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) of the European Union. Looking at the articulation between ends, ways, and means offers a perspective on the CSDP that is different from the approaches usually favoured by European Union specialists or even security studies scholars. In particular, it is argued here that the CSDP is no strategy, and little more than an institutional make-up for the lack of strategic thinking within the European Union. First, I show that the CSDP is not European security, and that the EU security policy is astonishingly absent from the security challenges facing Europe. Second, I argue that this situation stems from a lack of a political project within the European Union. I refer to the classical distinction made by Hans Morgenthau between pouvoir and puissance to show that, short of a political project, we will not see a strategic CSDP any time soon.

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 29 Jul 2013

Author biographies

Olivier Schmitt is a doctoral candidate in the Department of War Studies, King's College London, and an associate with the Paris-based Strategic Research Institute Ecole Militaire (Irsem).

Article metrics

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group