The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

European Planning Studies

Volume 22, Issue 12, 2014

Special Issue:   Invisible agents and hidden protagonists: rethinking creative cities policy

Translator disclaimer
Cultural Amenities: Large and Small, Mainstream and Niche—A Conceptual Framework for Cultural Planning in an Age of Austerity

Cultural Amenities: Large and Small, Mainstream and Niche—A Conceptual Framework for Cultural Planning in an Age of Austerity

DOI:
10.1080/09654313.2013.790594
Robert C. Kloostermana*

pages 2510-2525

Article Views: 199
Article usage statistics combine cumulative total PDF downloads and full-text HTML views from publication date (but no earlier than 25 Jun 2011, launch date of this website) to 30 Apr 2015. Article views are only counted from this site. Although these data are updated every 24 hours, there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.

Abstract

Cultural planning has been high on the agenda of many policy-makers. From an end in itself, it has been transformed into an instrument to regenerate neighbourhoods and even whole cities and as a means to boost the quality of place to attract high-skilled workers. With the current crunch on public spending, the question arises what will happen to cultural planning initiatives and what scope will remain for them. To explore what may happen to cultural planning in this age of austerity, we present a concise typology of cultural amenities based on two underlying, business model, dimensions. The first dimension concerns the supply side, namely the scale of provision of the cultural amenities. The second dimension, located on the demand side, is the market: orientation of the amenities: mainstream- or niche-oriented. Each type is associated with a specific location pattern, impact on the quality of place and funding configuration. We expect that the budget cuts will especially affect the small-scale, niche-oriented cultural amenities which are crucial for the quality of place. We also expect a trend towards further commercialization and commodification threatening the authenticity of the large-scale, niche-oriented cultural amenities.

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Published online: 01 May 2013

Author affiliations

  • a Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and Development Studies (AISSR), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam 1018 VZ, The Netherlands

Journal news

  • 2013 Impact Factor: 1.025
Sample our Built Environment journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group