Advanced Search

Development in Practice

Volume 19, Issue 8, 2009

Social accountability and community forest management: the failure of collaborative governance in the Wombat Forest

Social accountability and community forest management: the failure of collaborative governance in the Wombat Forest

DOI:
10.1080/09614520903220800
Nathanial Matthewsa* & Bruce Missinghamb

pages 1052-1063

Available online: 20 Oct 2009

Abstract

This article presents a critical analysis of what caused the failure of Australia's first Community Forest Management (CFM) trial. We explore how ‘community’ was conceptualised and represented through the dynamic CFM process, leading to contradictions and conflicts that could not be resolved. We examine the governance structures and institutions that were created to try to enable community participation in forest management. Ambiguity and uncertainty in the power and purpose of the CFM organisation, as well as power relationships within the organisation, all contributed to conflicts that eventually tore the CFM process apart.

Keywords

 

Details

  • Available online: 20 Oct 2009

Author affiliations

  • a PO Box 10907 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4000
  • b School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Building 11, Vic, Australia, 3800 E-mail:

Author biographies

Nathanial Matthews (corresponding author) is the Education and Research Officer at the International WaterCentre in Brisbane. He lectures on Integrated Water Management at the University of Queensland.

Bruce Missingham is an anthropologist and lecturer in the International Development and Environmental Analysis Program of Monash University.

Journal news

  • Now 8 issues per year

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group