The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Small Wars & Insurgencies

Volume 24, Issue 4, 2013

Translator disclaimer
Counterinsurgency in El Salvador: the lessons and limits of the indirect approach
Articles

Counterinsurgency in El Salvador: the lessons and limits of the indirect approach

DOI:
10.1080/09592318.2013.857938
David H. Uckoa*

pages 669-695

Abstract

Following two frustrating counterinsurgency campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a drive to find new and more viable ways of addressing irregular security challenges. In this effort, the 1980s' campaign in El Salvador has gained prominence, as it resulted in the defeat of the guerrilla adversary yet involved only a modest deployment of US personnel and resources. The use of history to search for models and precedents can be fruitful, but past conflicts must be understood on their own terms and not made to fit the preconceived ideas of the day. A deeper appreciation of what happened in El Salvador reveals not only the unique circumstances that shaped the campaign but also the limited results of the counterinsurgency program to which the war's outcome is now being ascribed. This article adopts a broader lens, focusing on the real yet undervalued factors that produced peace in El Salvador and whether the final outcome was truly quite as successful as is now commonly assumed.

Keywords:

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Received: 12 May 2013
  • Accepted: 18 Jul 2013
  • Published online: 27 Feb 2014

Author affiliations

  • a College of International Security Affairs (CISA), National Defense University (NDU), Washington, DC, USA

Article metrics

  • Views: 404

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group