Cart
Incidental Findings: A Common Law Approach
Abstract
Federal regulations governing human subjects research do not address key questions raised by incidental neuroimaging findings, including the scope of a researcher's disclosure with respect to the possibility of incidental findings and the question whether a researcher has an affirmative legal cuty to seek, detect, and report incidental findings. The scope of researcher duties may, however, be mapped with reference to common law doctrine, including fiduciary, tort, contract, and bailment theories of liability.
Keywords
- Recommend to:
- A friend
First page preview
Details
- Citation information:
- Available online: 29 Oct 2008
Author affiliations
- a Drake University Law School, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Journal news
- 2010 Impact Factor: 1.290 (© 2011 Thomson Reuters, 2010 Journal Citation Reports®)
- Enjoy free access to 10 most-cited articles (2008-2010).
Librarians
- Librarians' area
- Pricing
- Institutional account
- Access entitlements
- Co-branding
- IP ranges
- Link resolver preferences
- Usage reports