Looking at trends of professionalization of intelligence analysis within the United States Air Force as a subset of the broader US Intelligence Community, this paper calls for a re-evaluation of the professionalization of intelligence analysis away from a bureaucratic ‘corporateness’ approach examining the traits of a profession. Instead, reform of intelligence analysis should focus on the unique expertise and responsibility that define the profession. It identifies the analyst's unique expertise as managing adversary information to reduce a decision maker's uncertainty, and the responsibility in striving to improve capabilities within the profession while ensuring both the strengths and limitations of intelligence analysis are understood by intelligence customers. By focusing on corporateness, the community jeopardizes reform efforts by moving professionalization toward ‘getting the right answer’ and away from a broader understanding of the strengths and limitations inherent in the field of intelligence, where getting the right answer isn't often attainable.
Michael P. Kreuzer is the Chief of Analysis Enterprise Management for Air Combat Command. In this capacity, he is the US Air Force's executive agent for reforming intelligence analysis and for intelligence analysis support to combat air forces. A 2002 graduate of the US Air Force Academy, he holds a PhD in Public Affairs from Princeton University (2014), a Masters of Public Administration from the University of Alaska Anchorage (2007), and a Masters of Strategic Intelligence from American Military University (2009). He is a non-resident fellow of the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination. All views presented represent those of the author and do not reflect the Department of Defense or the US Air Force.
Journal news
"The premier journal of intelligence studies" Eliot A. Cohen, Foreign Affairs