Advanced Search

Journal of Sports Sciences

Volume 26, Issue 1, 2008

Kinematic measures and stroke rate variability in elite female 200-m swimmers in the four swimming techniques: Athens 2004 Olympic semi-finalists and French National 2004 Championship semi-finalists

Kinematic measures and stroke rate variability in elite female 200-m swimmers in the four swimming techniques: Athens 2004 Olympic semi-finalists and French National 2004 Championship semi-finalists

DOI:
10.1080/02640410701332515
P. Hellardab*, J. Dekerlec, M. Avalosd, N. Caudala, M. Knoppa & C. Hausswirthe

pages 35-46

Available online: 20 May 2008

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess stroke rate variability in elite female swimmers (200-m events, all four techniques) by comparing the semi-finalists at the Athens 2004 Olympic Games (n = 64) and semi-finalists at the French National 2004 Championship (n = 64). Since swimming speed (V) is the product of stroke rate (SR) and stroke length (SL), these three variables and the coefficient of variation of stroke rate (CVSR) of the first and second 100 m were determined (V1, V2; SR1, SR2; SL1, SL2; CVSR1, CVSR2) and differences between the two parts of the events were calculated (ΔV; ΔSR; ΔSL; ΔCVSR). When the results for the four 200-m events were analysed together, SR1, SR2, SL1, and SL2 were higher (α = 0.05, P < 0.001) and ΔV, ΔSR, and ΔCVSR were lower (P < 0.01) in the Olympic group than in the National group. The Olympic-standard swimmers exhibited faster backstrokes and longer freestyle strokes (P < 0.05). Both CVSR1 and CVSR2 were lower for freestyle and backstroke races in the Olympic group than in the National group (P < 0.001). Our results suggest that stroke rate variability is dependent on an interaction between the biomechanical requisites of the task (techniques) and the standard of the swimmer.

Keywords

 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Available online: 20 May 2008

Author affiliations

  • a Département d'Etudes et Recherches, Fédération Française de Natation, Paris, France
  • b Faculté des Sciences du Sport de Bordeaux 2, UPRES 498 – Laboratoire Vie Sportive, Tradition, Innovation et Intervention, France
  • c University of Brighton, Eastbourne, East Sussex, UK
  • d INSERM U875, Université Bordeaux 2, France
  • e Département des Sciences du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France

Journal news

  • 2010 Impact Factor: 1.870. Ranking in 2010 ISI Journal Citation Reports: 31/79 (Sport Sciences)
  • Reprints of articles published in Journal of Sports Sciences can be obtained through Rightslink

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group