Skip to content

Taylor & Francis Online recently reset password strength requirements. If your login is unsuccessful, please use the 'Forgot password' link to reset your password. Customers with access by IP recognition, remote password, OpenAthens or Shibboleth are not affected.

The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology

Volume 27, Issue 4, 2007

Translator disclaimer
The Effects of Person Versus Performance Praise on Children’s Motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors

The Effects of Person Versus Performance Praise on Children’s Motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors

DOI:
10.1080/01443410601159852
Jennifer Henderlong Corpusa* & Mark R. Lepperb

pages 487-508

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine how gender and age moderate the long‐term and post‐failure motivational consequences of person versus performance praise. In Study 1, fourth‐ and fifth‐grade students (n = 93) engaged in a puzzle task while receiving either no praise, person praise, product praise, or process praise. Following a subsequent failure experience, behavioural measures indicated that product and process praise enhanced motivation and person praise dampened motivation for girls, but that there were few effects of praise on subsequent motivation for boys. In Study 2, a parallel procedure with preschool children (n = 76) showed that person, product, and process praise all enhanced motivation, relative to neutral feedback, for both girls and boys.

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Published online: 25 Jul 2007

Author affiliations

  • a Reed College , Portland, USA
  • b Stanford University , USA

Author notes

  • Mark R. Lepper -

    This research is based on the first author’s dissertation, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. at Stanford University. This work was supported, in part, by a Spencer Dissertation Fellowship and a Graduate Research Opportunity grant from Stanford University. Portions of this work were presented at the 2000 meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the 2001 meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and assistance of participating schools and the research assistants who aided in data collection.

Journal news

  • Included in the Social Sciences Citation Index® 2014 Impact Factor 0.667

Article metrics

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group