The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volume 33, Issue 13, 2012

Translator disclaimer
Determination of ice cloud models using MODIS and MISR data

Determination of ice cloud models using MODIS and MISR data

DOI:
10.1080/01431161.2011.642323
Yu Xiea*, Ping Yanga, George W. Kattawarb, Patrick Minnisc, Yongxiang Huc & Dong L. Wud

pages 4219-4253

Article Views: 155
Article usage statistics combine cumulative total PDF downloads and full-text HTML views from publication date (but no earlier than 25 Jun 2011, launch date of this website) to 13 Feb 2015. Article views are only counted from this site. Although these data are updated every 24 hours, there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.

Abstract

Representation of ice clouds in radiative transfer simulations is subject to uncertainties associated with the shapes and sizes of ice crystals within cirrus clouds. In this study, we examined several ice cloud models consisting of smooth, roughened, homogeneous and inhomogeneous hexagonal ice crystals with various aspect ratios. The sensitivity of the bulk scattering properties and solar reflectances of cirrus clouds to specific ice cloud models is investigated using the improved geometric optics method (IGOM) and the discrete ordinates radiative transfer (DISORT) model. The ice crystal habit fractions in the ice cloud model may significantly affect the simulations of cloud reflectances. A new algorithm was developed to help determine an appropriate ice cloud model for application to the satellite-based retrieval of ice cloud properties. The ice cloud particle size retrieved from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data, collocated with Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) observations, is used to infer the optical thicknesses of ice clouds for nine MISR viewing angles. The relative differences between view-dependent cloud optical thickness and the averaged value over the nine MISR viewing angles can vary from −0.5 to 0.5 and are used to evaluate the ice cloud models. In the case for 2 July 2009, the ice cloud model with mixed ice crystal habits is the best fit to the observations (the root mean square (RMS) error of cloud optical thickness reaches 0.365). This ice cloud model also produces consistent cloud property retrievals for the nine MISR viewing configurations within the measurement uncertainties.

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Received: 21 Dec 2010
  • Accepted: 13 Oct 2011
  • Published online: 22 Dec 2011

Author affiliations

  • a Department of Atmospheric Sciences , Texas A&M University , College Station , TX , 77843 , USA
  • b Department of Physics & Astronomy , Texas A&M University , College Station , TX , 77843 , USA
  • c NASA Langley Research Center , Hampton , VA , 23681 , USA
  • d Jet Propulsion Laboratory , Pasadena , CA , 91109 , USA

Journal news

Sample our Geography journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group