The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Journal of Strategic Studies

Volume 36, Issue 4, 2013

Translator disclaimer
Reconsidering a Naval Blockade of China: A Response to Mirski
Original Articles

Reconsidering a Naval Blockade of China: A Response to Mirski

DOI:
10.1080/01402390.2013.790811
Evan Braden Montgomerya

pages 615-623

Abstract

Sean Mirski's assessment of a naval blockade is an important contribution to the debate over how the United States should respond to China's growing military power. Nevertheless, it has three limitations. First, although distant and close-in blockades could be employed in tandem, analyzing them separately helps to explain when they might be used and how they could influence escalation. Second, while conventional countervalue and counterforce options could also be employed together, this would depend on the degree to which they overlapped and the order in which they were implemented. Third, a blockade could lead to unanticipated prewar, intra-war, and postwar challenges.

Key Words

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 31 May 2013

Author affiliations

  • a Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments , Washington , DC , USA

Author biographies

Evan Braden Montgomery is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA). In addition to authoring a number of CSBA monographs, his work has appeared in International Security, Security Studies, and Foreign Affairs.

Journal news

Article metrics

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group