The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Journal of Strategic Studies

Volume 36, Issue 3, 2013

Translator disclaimer
Bureaucracy Does Its Thing: US Performance and the Institutional Dimension of Strategy in Afghanistan
Original Articles

Bureaucracy Does Its Thing: US Performance and the Institutional Dimension of Strategy in Afghanistan

DOI:
10.1080/01402390.2013.764518
Todd Greentreea

pages 325-356

Abstract

It is not too soon to draw cautionary lessons from the inconclusive results of US performance during more than 11 years of Operation ‘Enduring Freedom’ in Afghanistan. As in Vietnam, fundamental difficulties persist in adapting enduring institutions to the requirements of strategy. At the heart of the matter is tension between the assumptions that underlie counterinsurgency as practiced in Afghanistan and organization of the US Armed Forces, State Department, and Agency for International Development. Knowledge of basic principles and necessary changes is available to answer the question, could the US have done better?

KEY WORDS

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Published online: 26 Mar 2013

Author affiliations

  • a The Changing Character of War Programme , Oxford University

Author biographies

Todd Greentree is a member of the Changing Character of War Programme at Oxford University. A former US Foreign Service Officer, his political-military experience in five conflicts began in El Salvador during the early 1980’s. Most recently, he served as Director of the Initiatives Group in Regional Command-South, Kandahar, Afghanistan during 2010-11.

Journal news

Article metrics

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group