The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Survival: Global Politics and Strategy

Volume 52, Issue 1, 2010

Translator disclaimer

Abstract

Observers have attributed the long-term crisis between North Korea and its adversaries America, South Korea and Japan, which has reached a new high point with two recent nuclear weapons tests, to various explanations. One is that the regime is simply irrational. Another is that Kim Jong Il requires a constant state of near-war to maintain domestic support for his leadership. More plausible, however, is the theory that provocative behaviour serves two basic North Korean goals: deterring an attack by its much stronger potential enemies and increasing Pyongyang's leverage for demanding payments and concessions. This assessment, nevertheless, does not rule out the possibility of North Korea and its adversaries achieving a rapprochement. Failure to achieve such a breakthrough in the past does not necessarily indicate insurmountable bad faith on the part of North Korea, but rather the difficulty of overcoming stringent domestic political constraints and suspicions on both sides.

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Published online: 03 Feb 2010

Author notes

  • Denny Roy -
    Denny Roy is a Senior Research Fellow, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Article metrics

Dangerous Liaisons: Audio Clip

Listen to the audio

Listen to author Alex Nicoll, discuss his article 'Dangerous Liaisons'. He provides an overview of the phone hacking crisis and talks about the ferocious competitiveness of British journalism that contributed to it.

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group